In response to my previous post, someone anonymously posted an excellent addition to my first post. I hope that person doesn't mind, but I feel the suggestions are strong and that they might get lost as a comment - so I am pulling them up here. Thank you "Anonymous" --- it is sharing information like this that helps us all!
Here is the comment:
"Thank you for addressing this topic. You really should write a book--your suggestions are much more thoughtful and useful than
others I have read! Your post is a tough act to follow, but I will plunge ahead anyway. <* Warning--long comments ahead *>
I have tried to tackle this topic from a different perspective--how good
are learning opportunities within specific departments? For freshman and sophomores, do introductory courses provide a survey of the field with assignments stressing analytical reasoning and effective communication? For juniors and seniors, do advanced courses address specific topics in depth and ask students to clarify and resolve problems through extended individualized projects?
I don't know of many ready statistics which measure these things. So I have been sifting through college web-sites and publications looking
for indicators of educational quality like these:
1. Do required courses in major provide a good survey of field or do they ignore some areas and concentrate on hot academic topics?
- inspect recommendations or accreditation requirements of professional associations
- consider personal recommendations of graduates majoring in field
2. Are introductory courses taught by experienced faculty who have personally explored a range of issues, including senior faculty at large schools, or are introductory courses taught by less experienced faculty with more specialized research interests?
- inspect course catalog, teaching assignments, faculty bios
3. Do introductory course include small faculty-lead discussion groups and multiple assignments which develop evidence-based reasoning, quantitative analysis, and effective writing?
- consult course descriptions, syllabi, department web-sites;
question instructors, department chairs, majors
4. Are advanced courses taught by intellectually active faculty, including younger faculty at small colleges?
- inspect faculty biographies to evaluate faculty which have recently published, exhibited at meetings or galleries, served as journal editors, received grants or special recognition, mentored
undergraduates, or offered new courses
5. Does the department actively promote junior and senior research projects, internships, or other off-campus learning opportunities to
all of its majors by sponsoring scholarships, outreach programs, and exhibitions/symposia, etc.?
- read department web-sites, student newspapers
6. Does the department include at least three advanced courses of high interest to student which will be taught sometime during junior and senior years?
- inspect course descriptions and teaching assignments, consider course scheduling regularity and faculty sabbatical period
7. Does the department require a senior project which results in a serious paper or portolio?
- inspect department web-sites and institutional publications
8. Does the department include at least three faculty members currently sponsoring undergraduate projects who might serve as mentors for a
student?
- identify advisors for senior projects, undergraduate research papers
9. Are some members of department actively engaged in redesigning and testing effectiveness of introductory courses?
- inspect department web-sites and institutional publications
10. Does department regularly seek and react to feedback on student
success?
- consult department web-sites, Office of Institutional Research
11. Does institution require students to take pre-approved courses which stress development of quantitative reasoning and effective writing skills?
- consult course catalog, graduation requirements
12. Has institution implemented strong academic advisement,
advocacy, and placement programs to make student aware of options and opportunities?
- inspect institutional web-site and publications
13. Do administrative staff run an institutional monitoring program which provides feedback, rewards teaching and mentorship, and affects
institutional budgetary emphasis? Office of Institutional Research
- read Office of Institutional Research web-pages, student newspaper, institutional publications
As you noted earlier, students often change their majors. So I
understand folks may be wary of a department-focused evaluation
of colleges. However, most students seem to change majors either to a related department or to another pre-existing interest area. If so, then most potential changes can be anticipated. Do you know of any research cataloging patterns of major changes in college?
These criteria reflect particular notions about features of a good college
education. Others may disagree. I also expect different academic fields require different approaches. The thirteen criteria above may work best for science and possible social science majors. Potential arts majors may emphasize department characteristics more than
individual faculty mentors or related departments--hard to see a visual arts-oriented person finding 3 potential mentors or shifting to a music major! A humanities major might use a different mix. I even have doubts that different approaches align with the academic pigeon-holes of arts, humanities, social sciences, and sciences.
As you noted earlier, college web-sites (and publications) differ in quality. That is why I call these criteria "indicators". Their presence indicates concern for educational quality, while their absence requires more investigation. Hopefully these criteria are more useful for evaluating academic fit (and less susceptible to marketing manipulation) than institution-wide measures of 'academic quality'.
Enough with this over-wrought contribution to the the search for college 'fit'!. You are much more knowledgeable about these matters than I. I am curious to hear what you think, but please feel free to pick and choose as the muse strikes.
"